8.5 Midterm Paper


Midterm Paper assignment: 

Please watch Seconds,  read Paul Schrader’s “Notes on Film Noir”  Download PDF Paul Schrader’s “Notes on Film Noir”(1971) and read Vincent LoBrutto's  "The Surreal Images of Seconds." (Links to an external site.) The only other sources you may use and/or quote in this assignment is our textbook James Naremore's Film Noir A Very Short Introduction and module materials. Include these  sources on your Works Cited page. Citation formatting can be found on easybib (Links to an external site.). If you need to review instructions for taking screenshots please review Module 0.

Please cite any quotes using footnotes or MLA formatted citation with a separate Works Cited page. You can find a comprehensive resource for formatting at the Purdue Owl Writing site (Links to an external site.) online.

Considering our framing, discussion, and viewing of 7 films so far this semester choose 1 to compare and contrast with our class screening of John Frankenheimer’s Seconds (1966).

In your discussion investigate both films in light of at least 2 of the following conditions proposed by Schrader:

1.War and Post-War Disillusionment
2.Post-War Realism
3.The German Influence
4.The Hard-Boiled Tradition
 

Films we've looked at in this class so far

Gun Crazy (1950)

Double Indemnity (1944)

The Public Enemy (1931) - proto-noir and pre-war, per our in class discussion

Detour (1945)

Le Jour Se Leve (Daybreak) (1939) - arguably more difficult being French, and pre-war, but possible

Mildred Pierce (1945)

Out of the Past (1947)

 
PAPER FORMAT/LENGTH REQUIREMENT:

Your paper should be

1. spell and grammar checked
2. a minimum of 2 full pages (not including works cited)
3. proper citation of works cited
4. in text citations (quotes and reference to info you found in texts)
5. double spaced (no extra spacing)
6. 12 point font maximum
7. doc, docx, pdf, txt files ONLY. If you use Pages please save as a PDF and submit that.

If you need it MS Word has a MLA template.  A Google search can also result in a properly formatted MLA template in a variety of file formats.


MY PAPER

Ida Z.

Professor Denah Johnson

Cine 23B - Focus on Film Noir

31 March 2022

Film Noir, as seen through the films: Detour (Edgar G. Ulmer, 1945)
 and Seconds (John Frankenheimer, 1966)

In 1946 post-war, a selection of American films was screened in France, they showed a different side of America from the pre-war classical Hollywood paradigm films with happy endings to a new post-war film marked with a different style (Durgnat 37). That style showed a “new mood of cynicism, pessimism and darkness” (Schrader 8). Thus, two French critics in 1946 gave these films the name noir (dark, black) (Naremore 2009 10). That ‘new mood’ came from American post-war disillusionment and was different in that “film noir was first of all, a style, that worked it’s conflicts out visually” (Schrader 13). This noir style was created in the Hollywood thirties and forties with the expertise of German filmmaker expatriates who had come to flee from the war. These filmmakers had worked in German expressionist film and were experts in chiaroscuro technique. The films Detour (Edgar G. Ulmer, 1945) and Seconds (John Frankenheimer, 1966) are good examples of the themes of post-war disillusionment and a particular visual style.

The disillusionment shown in film noir, “hit its zenith in the late ‘40s, a time when veterans were returning home in droves after having witnessed unimaginable horrors. Under the weight of war trauma, men felt the brittle veneer of traditional masculinity – strong, stoic and dominant — crack and crumble. Film Noir tapped into this anxiety. It’s no accident that film scholars have called Film Noir the male weepy” (Crowe).

Shrader states that film noir can be subdivided in three broad phases (Schrader 11). Detour belongs to the first-time phase of film noir films that Schrader describes as: “the first war time period, 1941-'46 approximately, the phase of the private eye and the lone wolf … in general, more talk than action” (Schrader 11). Al Roberts of Detour is a lone wolf character in this film. The violence is very Hays Code, subtle or offscreen.

            In Detour’s anti-hero Al Roberts, we see a man who is a classically trained pianist, yet he could only get a job beneath him in a dinner club called “Break O’ Dawn Club.” He plays in the background while people ignore him and eat their meals. He has no money to travel across country except by thumbing rides and has planned not to eat until he gets to his destination. He meets Vera a woman also thumbing across the country from town to town to get a better job or someone to swindle. They are the mood of film noir of pessimism and darkness.  This was something that the audiences could relate to as they were having tough economic times themselves and post-war discontent.

In Seconds we meet the anti-hero, Arthur Hamilton. The film fits the definition, not the dates, of Schrader’s third time phase of film noir films. “The third and final phase of film noir, from 1949- '53, was the period of psychotic action and suicidal impulse. The noir hero, seemingly under the weight of ten years of despair, started to go bananas” (Schrader 12).

The film starts with Arthur, a man who is beaten down by the American dream and carries years of despair and unhappiness in his unfulfilling yet prosperous life. He receives a call that can change his life into something wonderful from an old friend Charlie, his homme-noir in the film.

He obeys Charlie and proceeds to The Corporation where he believes his life can change for the better. He is met by a corporate salesman Mr. Ruby, whose opening line is, “I’ve been assigned to go over the circumstances of your death with you.”  Arthur doesn’t run out of the room; he continues the conversation. Mr. Ruby tells him how well his death could be staged, perhaps in a hotel room fire? Arthur replies, no, I mean I can’t be sure. They are describing a kind of ‘psychotic situation’ and Arthur has a ‘suicidal impulse’ to go ahead with it.

The closer salesman, the unnamed “Old Man” owner, asks him, “but what does it all mean? It can’t mean anything now, anymore. There’s nothing anymore, is there? Anything at all?” And by the end of the conversation, he convinces him. Arthur says he believes him and signs the papers of his death.  

I’ve considered that film is a mental illusion, and that we are in Arthur’s head.  Arthur is not narrating but we are following him in the story. Are we following a reliable or the subjective thoughts of a character? I believe he has been debating in his mind during late nights in his suburban home on his discontent and feeling suicidal.

During his ponderings over death, he envisions what it would be like to be switched out with another person and start over. He envisions the great things that could happen if he was someone else. Then he decides that his life would end up just the same way in unhappiness, controlled by higher forces that would tell him what to want or not want. I believe he found that he was destined to ill-fate. I believe he does commit suicide in a hotel room fire. Perhaps even after an unsuccessful affair with a Nora look-alike.

In the other film, Detour, there is another beaten down anti-hero, Al Roberts, and there is also a body swap.  Al, due to the circumstances of his hitch-hike driver dying, puts on his clothes, takes his wallet and car and assumes his identity as Charles Haskell Jr.  Here we do have an unreliable first-person narrator, a feature of film noir. The narration is done in voice-over, flashback narration. Did he kill Haskell to be able to assume his identity? We don’t know for sure.

He can now drive to the destiny he wants with $300 in his wallet, a new ID card and a nice car. In keeping with the theme of fatalism, he picks up that one in a million-chance person that knows the man he is impersonating. His dreams of starting over with a body swap have also turned out to be a nightmare. He was a man fated to lose in keeping with the theme of fatalism in noir storytelling.

How was “new mood of cynicism, pessimism and darkness” expressed? As mentioned earlier, “film noir was first of all, a style, that worked it’s conflicts out visually” (Schrader 13).

Edgar G Ulmer, director of the film Detour, is one of the European expatriates that Schrader mentions: “in the Twenties and Thirties, and these filmmakers and technicians had, for the most part, integrated themselves into the American film establishment” (Schrader 10).

Ulmer had worked with and learned from F.W. Murnau (Krohn) who made the landmark German Expressionist film, Nosferatu (F.W. Murnau,1922). “This movement, of which Murnau's classic is clearly a member, externalizes emotions and relies upon a heavily theatrical acting style to achieve that aim. Expressionism has many components, including a strong visual approach and a visceral appeal, but subtlety is not among them” (Beradinelli). Nosferatu was not like a traditionally frightening horror film, “but the result of Muranu's artistic approach is a pervasive sense of eeriness and unease” (Beradinelli).

German Expressionist visual style made its way into film noir through these expatriates. German Expressionism “established the concept of using light and shadows to reflect character psychology—a notion that would continue in German cinema and spill over into film noir, a genre largely influenced by expressionist cinema in tone and narrative (Saporito).

We see this visual style of using lighting to reflect character’s psychology in Detour. When Al Roberts, the anti-hero, begins his first-person flashback narrative of his experience of the last few months, his face and the background is darkened. His eyes are highlighted with dim light as the rest of him is almost blacked out. This reflects the mood also of the tale he will tell.

“In film noir, the central character is likely to be standing in the shadow. When the environment is given an equal or greater weight than the actor, it, of course, creates a fatalistic, hopeless mood. There is nothing the protagonist can do; the city will outlast and negate even his best efforts” (Schrader 11).

Shrader states, “the actors and setting are often given equal lighting emphasis. An actor is often hidden in the realistic tableau of the city at night, and, more obviously, his face is often blacked out by shadow as he speaks” (Schrader 11).

Naremore in chapter four of the Film Noir reader reviews other specific visuals used in Detour. Ulmer “represents New York with a single street lamp on a foggy studio set, and he renders Los Angeles with a used car lot and the drive-in restaurant. He makes expressive use of old-fashioned optical devices such as wipes and irises, and he's the only Hollywood director beside Welles to deliberately exploit the artificiality of Back projection see the enlarged fence posts or guardrails that stream by the windows of Haskell's car as he and Al Drive by night (Naremore 2019 70)

 

The film Seconds visually exploits feelings of fear, paranoia and extreme disorientation. The collaboration between director, John Frankenheimer and cinematographer, James Wong Howe showed a European touch. “By pushing conventional technique aside and working with a visual grammar of exaggeration and extreme graphic amplification, Howe and Frankenheimer revealed the mind of a man struggling to break free of his emotional bonds” (LoBrutto).
The film allowed “Howe to experiment with optics and camera movement to heighten the tale's terror” (LoBrutto).  

 In the hotel scene, “the room’s heavily textured walls raked at extreme angles to create a false sense of perspective, while the floor undulated beneath black-and-white checkerboard tiles. Exemplified by this scene, the physical and optical distortion achieved by Haworth's sets and Howe's cinematography combined throughout Seconds to create a disturbing, stomach-churning effect of a Kafkaesque universe” (LoBrutto, Vincent).  

This brings memories of the German Expressionist film The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (Robert Wiene, 1920) where the sets are distorted and the walkway where Cesare escapes is an undulated surface that is extremely distorted.

The film Seconds has a strong theme of angst and fighting against authority and conformity. “German Expressionism often explores stories of people fighting against authority and conformity, this will translate as a main thematic concern in the American Gangster film and Film Noir” (Johnson, module 3.1).

“The themes of authority and conformity in The Cabinet of Doctor Caligari are both a reflection of post-World War One Germany. The disturbing foreshadowing of what was to come” (No Film School).

Arthur is a character that is unfulfilled spiritually by the American dream. Arthur says to his homme-noir, Charlie, after the unsuccessful attempt at being ‘reborn’ into Tony Wilson and changing his life, “I had to find out where I went wrong. The years I’ve spent trying to get all the things I was told were important. That I was supposed to want. Things, not people or meaning.” 

In the gruesome ending of Seconds, the anti-hero is still fighting for control of his life from The Corporation as they decide that he will move to phase two of their plan for him.

The Old Man, the company creator, sits on his bed and says calmy, “The doctors are waiting.” Arthur/Tony replies, “But there's things we have to talk about. I mean, my identity... The thing about doing it on my own.”

The Old Man answers that they would talk about it later, “Just relax, son. Everything's going to be just fine.” As Arthur/Tony keeps asserting that “You see, it's so important...choice. You've got to change; we have to talk about it.” The Old Man responds, “we will son, relax everything is going to be fine. I’ll look into it personally.”

Then Arthur/Tony, is put on a mobile operating table and wheeled to his death as The Corporation no longer has any need for his life, just his cadaver. The horror of this scene is expressed visually by Howe.

“The enclosed set led Howe to experiment with optics and camera movement to heighten the tale's terror, best evident the end of the picture as Tony Wilson is strapped to a gurney and wheeled into the operating room thrashing and struggling as he realizes the end is near. The camera, often mounted to the gurney and fitted with either the 9.7mm or an 18mm lens, is an unflinching witness to Wilson's desperate yet vain efforts to free himself; the optics bend the set walls inward, adding to the claustrophobic horror of the sequence” (LoBrutto).  

This story is told visually without any more narration from the protagonist. Schrader states that “compositional tension is preferred to physical action. A typical film noir would rather move the scene cinematographically around the actor than have the actor control the scene by physical action” (LoBrutto).  Arthur is struggling in this scene, yet it is the cinematography around him that is creating the compositional tension.

The elements of post-war disillusionment and the particular visual style of film noir have been shown to be used in Detour and Seconds. The human angst is visualized by having an ill-fated life that is not the optimistic one promised by years of study and doing what one was told. Whether it is growing up to be a classically trained pianist or going to Harvard and becoming an executive at a bank. This unsatisfaction that viewers of their eras felt by their promises also not being fulfilled is shown in these noir films. This film style is not offering the Hollywood happy endings of pre-war of Classical Hollywood Style, these films are painted black.

 


Works Cited

 

Berardinelli, James. “Nosferatu.” Reelviews Movie Reviews, 31 Dec. 1969,

 

https://www.reelviews.net/reelviews/nosferatu.

Crow, Jonathan. “The 5 Essential Rules of Film Noir.” Open Culture, 5 June 2014,

  https://www.openculture.com/2014/06/the-5-rules-of-film-noir.html.

Durgnat, Raymond. " Paint it Black: The Family Tree of the Film Noir." Film Noir: Reader,
New York Limelight Ed, 1996. Print, pp. 37-51

Frankenheimer, John, director. Seconds. Paramount Pictures/Joel Productions/Gibraltar, 1966.

Johnson, Denah. “German Expressionism.” Cine 23B - Focus on Film Noir; Module 3.1, 2022, https://ccsf.instructure.com/courses/46481/pages/3-dot-1-german-expressionism?module_item_id=2679107.

Krohn, Bill. “Edgar G. Ulmer.” Film Comment, 30 Aug. 2017, https://www.filmcomment.com/article/edgar-g-ulmer/.

LoBrutto, Vincent. “The Surreal Images of Seconds.” The American Society of Cinematography, 31 Jan. 2018.

Naremore, James. Film Noir: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Print.

Naremore, James. " The History of an Idea." More Than Night: Film Noir in Its Contexts, Berkeley, Calif., Univ. of California Press, 2009. Print, pp. 9-39.   

 No Film School. “German Expressionism, Explained.” YouTube, No Film School by Press Play Productions, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecuQdkBx1ic&t=3s.

Saporito, Jeff. “Why Is ‘the Cabinet of Dr. Caligari’ Considered the Definitive German Expressionist Film?: Read: The Take.” Why Is "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" Considered the Definitive German Expressionist Film? | Read | The Take, 27 May 2020, https://the-take.com/read/why-is-the-cabinet-of-dr-caligari-considered-the-definitive-german-expressionist-film.

Schrader, Paul. “Notes on Film Noir.” Film Comment, 1972, pp. 8–13.  

Silver, Alain, et al. “Paint It Black: The Family Tree of Film Noir.” Film Noir Reader, Limelight Editions, 1996. Print.

Ulmer, Edgar G., director. Detour. PRC Pictures Production Company, 1945.

           

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

6.7 Module 6 Summary

16.4 SCREENING: BOUND

16.1 Key Term Review