16.5 FINAL

FINAL 

Due Monday by 11:59pm     Points 100
Available after May 16 at 2pm

Corky and Vincent

Considering our framing, discussion, and viewing of The Wachowski’s Bound (1996)

Explore:

1)2 aspects of how the film meets or crosses over into classical Noir execution.

2) include at least 2 elements of the film that stand
    as examples of Bound as a post-modern or neo-noir work.

 
Remember to include not only plot/story elements
but also visual,
aural
and tonal elements
that support your discussion 

as relevant to a work of cinema
(editing, cinematography, lighting, acting, direction, etc.). 

I’m not overly concerned with your use of proper industry terminology, discuss these elements as you would in class discussion – what is important is that you explore the film as a whole in relation to its classical elements of noir as well as how it manifests as a later work that is influenced by this period but goes beyond the confines of classical examples to explore new territory.


1) EXPLORE 2 EXAMPLES OF HOW THE FILM MEETS CLASSICAL NOIR EXECUTION (50 POINTS)

2) EXPLORE 2 ELEMENTS THAT STAND AS EXAMPLES OF BOUND AS POST-MODERN, REVISIONIST OR NEO-NOIR WORK. HOW DOES THE FILM BUILD ON THE CLASSICAL FOUNDATION OF NOIR TO MAKE IT EXCITING FOR A CONTEMPORARY AUDIENCE? (50 POINTS)

Minimum 250 words per question.

Oops, I think I gave her four times the word count. I thought she meant 250 words per each 1/2 of the question. 

Oh well, Here's my final exam: 

Ida Z.

Cine 23B - Focus on Film Noir

Final Exam

May 23, 2022

 

Question 1
In the Wachowski’s Bound (1996) explore 2 aspects of how the film meets or crosses over into classical Noir execution.

 

Question 1 – Part 1

 

One example of Bound following classical noir execution is in the narrative structure and general storyline.

 

Bound follows a non-linear narrative structure that we see in other noir films where we start with the anti-hero near the end of the story. They are in a bad situation and looking back to see how they got there. We see this with Al Roberts in Detour (Edgar G. Ulmer, 1945) sitting in a café with his large mug of coffee. In Bound, we can see that Corky is severely beaten we don’t know if she is dead. Then there is flashback to the beginning of the story with no narrator and an omniscient point of view.

 

The standard noir storyline always has an anti-hero. In Bound we have Corky, who begins as the loser anti-hero just having gotten out of jail and now working a blue-collar job.

 

The anti-hero then meets the femme fatale. The sexually charged first encounter with long starring at each other and coy smiles, not looking away happens in Bound. It reminds me of the classic noir The Postman Always Rings Twice (Tay Garnett, 1946) where Lana Turner rolls her lipstick right up to John Garfield’s shoes. The camera rolls right back to where it came from and stops on her gorgeous legs. Then Lana and John go into a stare off. Lana Turner’s legs also reminded me of how we see only the bottom half of Violet’s beautiful seductive legs from under the sink.

The standard noir story continues with the femme fatale seducing the antihero – with ulterior motives for usually a big money grab freedom from the oppressor. This is done brilliantly in so many films, but the seduction of Corky by Violet, it reminds me of the beginning of Double Indemnity (Billy Wilder, 1944) where there is a lot of verbal flirtatious foreplay.
  Violet: You seem uncomfortable. Do I make you nervous, Corky?

  Corky: No.

  [drinks from beer bottle]

  Violet: Thirsty, maybe?

The noir story ends with the femme fatale making promises to run away with the anti-hero together after the scheme which sometimes does or does not happen due to a double cross.

Due to the Hays Code, the femme fatale always seems to die for her sins of greed and lust. However, Bound is not bound by the Hays code.

 

Question 1
In the Wachowski’s Bound (1996) explore 2 aspects of how the film meets or crosses over into classical Noir execution.

 

Question 1 – Part 2

 

Another example of classical noir stylistic execution in Bound was the creative cinematography and mise-en-scene and how it was done old-school. The cinematography was done by Bill Pope, pre-Wachowski special effects film era.

 

The noirs of early days such as Edgar Ulmer’s Detour had to make original and creative ways to film on the budgets that were given to them. Which in Detour’s case was shot for $117,000 in about fourteen days (Christopher Small).

Bound also had a tight-budget (Amy Wootten). “The whole film is shot within a small handful of interiors, yet Pope and the Wachowskis make excellent use of their space” (Deep Focus Review).

Shooting in a small handful of interiors is a cost saving device that was also used in the second half of filming Detour. It was filmed in a two-room apartment rented by Mrs. Charles Haskell.

I thought of Detour’s mise-en-scene when I saw the Bound set up of the two side-by-side apartments that were used for filming most scenes. In both films mostly the living room is used and this gets to be a small and claustrophobic space. A way to create mood.

In a film, the first few minutes are usually need to hook an audience. I was certainly hooked within the first five minutes of Bound when Corky and Violet meet each other in the elevator.

I knew the scene was powerful, even though there was hardly any dialogue. In studying this electric introduction, I saw that it was done in only 42 seconds. I studied the cinematography and it was nothing that couldn’t have been done in the noir days. The picture quality however was superior.

The scene in the elevator begins with at 2:04 with Corky in the elevator and Corky yelling, “Hold the elevator.” There is a medium close-up two shot of both women looking at each other as Corky walks in. The elevator background is bright red contrasting with the black outfits of the women and punctuated by Violet’s bright red lipstick. Corky’s, “Thanks” is the only other word said in the scene. The scene is shot in silence except for the dinging of the elevator as it passes floors.

Caesar walks in a brief medium shot and then an extreme close up of Caesar’s finger pressing the number 10 on the elevator key pad. Then we get a circular camera view of the close space starting with a close-up profile of Caesar’s face.  This cuts to a medium close up of Corky behind Caesar. Corky does a cool half glance in Violet’s direction, The camera then moves to a close-up of Violet who picks up on this subtly and first seems to look away, but then she takes off her sunglass. She twists her neck back and stares back doubly hard and seductively. The camera cuts back to Gina with a slight blink and then a sexy half smile and a drilling stare. Then there is a kind of acknowledgement of flirtation and Corky twists her head a bit crooked and stares again. Cut at 2:27 and a slight drum whisk beat begins.

Then there is an amazing overhead shot of all three of them in the elevator reminiscent of “overhead angles that remind us of Hitchcock” (Deep Focus Review). We see the whole scene from far atop of the elevator shaft looking down.

Closing the great opening scene is a medium close up of the top of Meg Tilley’s head and partial shoulder moving past Corky smiling, Then, for the finale (with the slow drum beating now) there is a shot from Corky’s point of view of a medium close up on Violet’s shapely behind as she walks down the hallway in slow motion (2:02-2:44).

My point in all this detail is that these type of camera shots have been available to filmmakers since before the noir days. The tension was all methodically worked out with simple close up and cuts back and forth. There was a lot of use of close-ups in the film, which brought one right into the characters face and subtle ques.

Cinematographer Bill Pope did an amazing job to create such a memorable and powerful introduction using old school camera techniques and delivering all of that within 42 seconds.

 

Question 2
In the Wachowski’s Bound (1996) include at least 2 elements of the film that stand as examples of a post-modern or neo-noir work.

 

Question 2 – Part 1

 

One element that screams out as different is the violence in neo-noir, the forbidden visual of the Hays code in film. Now in neo-noir, we see an embrace of it, “the Wachowskis use a gamut of filmic references and resources to tell a kind of cute, certainly romantic love story through graphic and violent neo-noir conventions” (Deep Focus Review).

 

Classic noir had to be so careful and creative in the 1940s to suggest but not show violence. In Detour (1945) Charles Haskell is killed with a slip out of the car and hitting his head on a rock. Vera is strangled with the pulling of a cord around her neck in a closed room. In Double Indemnity (Billy Wilder, 1944) during the murder scene, they shift the focus to the face of Phyllis while Walter strangles her husband. We hear the gurgling sounds of the strangulation and then just see a resulting smile on Phyllis’s face.

 

I found Bound to be a lot more like the pre-code Gangster genre of the 1930s than film noir. In The Public Enemy (William A. Wellman, 1931) they show the larger-than-life gangster lifestyle. The gangsters live well with a sweetie moll. James Cagney’s gangster companion Gwen lives in a lavish suite. This parallels the gorgeous penthouse in Bound where the gangster Caesar and Violet live.

 

The visual gangster killing in pre-code Hollywood was a bit shocking. Especially in a scene in The Public Enemy where Tom and Matt are gunned down on the sidewalk street with machine guns by an opposing gang. It is also something that don’t see again for decades due to the Hays codes rules on violence.  I don’t think they would’ve imagined back then, the mob scene killing in Bound. There’s was so much blood for one.

 

Let’s review the Bound version of a gangster assassination. It starts with Johnnie Marzzone the mob son’s boss ringing the doorbell of Caesar’s gangster holdup penthouse. Caesar says, “Hello?” to which Johnnie replies with “open the Fuck up.” The mob boss Gino, Johnnie his son and Roy, Gino’s bodyguard go up to Caesar and Violet’s Penthouse apartment.

 

By the end of the visit, Caesar has gunned down the whole head of his own mafia gang. First, he kills the mob boss Gino, in a fabulous shooting scene. “Do you point the gun at me?”  “We are family Cesare, give it to me.” An extreme close up of the mob boss’ hand on the barrel of the gun. An extreme close-up of him smiling, and then cut back to an extreme close-up of Caser with crazy eyes. We hear the bang sound of a gun and see Gino in a slow motion fall backwards, like Scotty in Hitchcock’s Vertigo (1958). 

 

This is followed by a quick kill of the minor character the bodyguard in one shot. A note on the sound effects. The gun shots are very sharp and make a great visual and audio kick to the scenes.

 

Caesar then shoots Johnnie so many times that he keeps clicking the gun but it has run out of bullets. Caesar is in momentary shock at what he has done. There is a huge, very red pool of blood gathering around Johnnie’s corpse of course because he was shot so many times.

 

Caesar kicks the corpse around a few times and yells at it and then starts to feel better. He tells Violet they’ll go find the money and everything will be fine.

 

Then they hear a police siren.

 

Roger Ebert had a perfect phrase for this type of Wachowski neo-noir violence. He called it. “Blood-soaked slapstick.”

 

Question 2
In the Wachowski’s Bound (1996) include at least 2 elements of the film that stand as examples of a post-modern or neo-noir work.

 

Question 2 – Part 2

 

The second element I will review is sex and the female in neo-noir.

 

In classical noir sex was insinuated but we did not see anything close to it or nudity. In the neo-noir Bound we see sex and nudity, tastefully and accurately presented. 

 The Wachowski's wanted to play with stereotypes (genre, gender, etc.) and make an entertaining film that contained sex and violence because those are the kind of films they like to watch” (Johnston, 16.3). They played with gender and sex in Bound by having the anti-hero and the femme-fatale as lesbians.

There are basically two sex scenes in Bound. The first is when Violet states her intentions after a long amount of teasing that she wants to seduce Corky. She is a very good seductress and the build-up is probably longer than the intimacy but it is excellent repartee. In the medium close ups, the women look sexy and beautiful. Their hook-up on the sofa is subtle and more focused on touch and kiss and soft speaking to each other.  It was certainly not like one in those old horror films in the woods where the high school kids are in the cabin hooking up and it’s all boobs and the nudity of the woman which the boys are enjoying.

This sexual choreography was intentional and directed by sexpert Susie Bright.  It was done with the intention “to choreograph the lesbian sex scenes and shun triggers of male-gaze focused softcore lesbianism” (Johnston, 16.3).

I was interested in the “bury your gays” trope which I understand is represented by a grave stone to represent the deaths of LGBT characters happening more often than to their heterosexual counterparts. The gay characters are unfortunately seen as more expendable.

 In an unfortunate comparison to the femme fatale of noir, LGBT sexuality was (is?) perceived as negative and depraved (tvtropes). In classical noir, the femme fatale always dies for her sins of lust and greed. This was required in a Hays code film. It was their job was to give the right standard of morals to the U.S. public. Women with sexual needs and desires was not one of them. 

In neo-noir we are not seeing the femme fatale be killed off in the films anymore. In Bound we are not seeing the LGBT leads or the femme fatale killed off in the film, in fact they succeed with a vengeance.

Corky, previously the loser anti-hero who went to jail for five years, isn’t double crossed. Violet does double cross the person she said she would double cross and then runs away with Corky.  We certainly don’t see happy endings in classic noir, but this neo-noir ending was great and made up for that.

 

Sources

Deep Focus Review. “Bound review by Brian Eggert, February 11, 2015” – Link: https://deepfocusreview.com/reviews/bound/

Johnston, Denah. “The Wachowski’s first feature film.” Cine 23B - Focus on Film Noir; Module 16.3, 2022,

Small, Christopher. "The Thumb-Route: Dispatches from Poverty Row" – Link: https://filmmakermagazine.com/107286-the-thumb-route-dispatches-from-poverty-row/#.YotMqajMKUl

tvtropes. “Bury Your Gays” – Link: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BuryYourGays

Wootten, Amy. "Hidden Gem: Bound," The Edge – Link: https://www.theedgesusu.co.uk/film/2016/03/01/hidden-gem-bound-1996/

 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

6.7 Module 6 Summary

16.4 SCREENING: BOUND

16.1 Key Term Review